...so I read in the paper today that the nutcase in New Brunswick, Depres, was found "not criminally responsible for his actions." Ok...that makes no sense. So he goes and brutally murders an elderly couple and apparently the judge feels that he didn't know right from wrong when he did that so instead of going to jail, he'll spend time in a mental prison where they'll re-assess his situation every year. Does anyone else see that as completely retarded? I think the judge had a temporary moment of insanity, don't you?
So basically what you're telling me is that Depres woke up that morning, went crazy, killed his neighbors, ran away and hid for a while and that he did this all while he was nuts....almost like the boogie man made him do it. Now, he could roam the earth in a year or two when he's back to the real world (in his head) like nothing happened. Righton crayon. I think that if this guy is capable of having "an out of body experience" such as this then maybe we should lock him up just in case he has another bad day - not ship him out on the streets when he can tell them he's all better. Paul Bernado brutally murdered a bunch of people and we've locked him up for years and years - was he thinking sanely when he comitted his crimes? I hardly think so as no bright person does something like that. What makes him any different than this Depres guy? If Depres didn't know what he did was wrong then why did he take off in hiding? Why wouldn't he of turned on the TV and played a boardgame....why not mow the lawn....why not make a cup of coffee and read the paper...to me that would be what a person would do if they had no sweet clue what was going on...HELLO!
What ever happened to common sense?
"...I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed..." - Smash Mouth
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment